VALIDACIJA SRPSKOG PREVODA SKALE SOCIJALNE PODRŠKE MOS-SSS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2015.3.245-264Ključne reči:
socijalna podrška, validnost, konfirmativna faktorska analiza, bifaktorski modelApstrakt
Osnovni cilj ovog istraživanja je bio provera konstrukt i konvergentne validnosti srpskog prevoda Skale socijalne podrške Studije medicinskih ishoda (MOS-SSS; The Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey: Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991). U Studiji 1 (N = 604, 74% žena, prosečna starost = 20.60 godina) ispitivana je konstrukt validnost skale korišćenjem konfirmativne faktorske analize. U Studiji 2 (N = 200, 52.5% žena, prosečna starost = 21.82 godina) je proverena konvergentna validnost skale, ispitivanjem povezanosti sa dva indikatora interpersonalnog funkcionisanja (opažena socijalna podrška i usamljenost) i tri indikatora blagostanja (zadovoljstvo životom, depresivnost, generalno blagostanje). Rezultati su pokazali da strukturu skale najbolje opisuje bifaktorski model, koji pretpostavlja jedan generalni faktor socijalne podrške i četiri specifična faktora socijalne podrške: Emocionalna/Informacijska, Praktična, Afekciona i Pozitivne socijalne interakcije. Rezultati bifaktorskog modela su pokazali da generalni faktor objašnjava najveći procenat ukupne (44.3%) i zajedničke varijanse (69.6%) socijalne podrške, dok specifični faktori objašnjavaju mali procenat ukupne (od 3.7% do 7.0%) i zajedničke varijanse (od 5.9% do 11%). Analiza pouzdanosti (omega-hijerarhijski koeficijent) pokazuje da je moguće pouzdano interpretirati samo ukupan skor na skali, a da je računanje skorova po subskalama neopravdano. Skala je pokazala odličnu konvergentnu validnost, koju potvrđuje visoka korelacija sa drugom merom socijalne podrške, i umerene korelacije sa usamljenošću i pokazateljima blagostanja. Nalazi ovog istraživanja podržavaju upotrebu skale MOS-SSS kao instrumenta koji omogućava validnu i pouzdanu procenu generalne socijalne podrške kod mladih osoba.Metrics
Reference
Adamczyk, K., & Segrin, C. (2015). Perceived social support and mental health among single vs. partnered Polish young adults. Current Psychology, 34, 82–96.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9242-5
Anderson, D., Bilodeau, B., Deshaies, G., Gilbert, M., & Jobin, J. (2005). French-Canadian validation of the MOS Social Support Survey. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 21(10), 867–873.
Bernardon, S., Babb, K. A., Hakim-Larson, J., & Gragg, M. (2011). Loneliness, attachment, and the perception and use of social support in university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43(1), 40–51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021199
Canivez, G. L. (in press). Bifactor modeling in construct validation of multifactored tests: Implications for understanding multidimensional constructs and test interpretation. In K. Schweizer & C. DiStefano (Eds.), Principles and methods of test construction: Standards and recent advancements. Göttingen: Hogrefe Publishers.
Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J. P., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80, 219–251.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x
Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and secondorder models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189–225.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Chu, P. S., Saucier, D. A., & Hafner, E. (2010). Meta-analysis of the relationships between social support and well-being in children and adolescents. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(6), 624–645.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.6.624
Costa-Requena, G., Salamero, M., & Gil, F. (2007). Validity of the questionnaire MOS-SSS of social support in neoplastic patients. Medicina Clínica (Barcelona), 128(18), 687–691.
De Jong Gierveld, J., & Kamphuis, F. H. (1985). The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(3), 289–299.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900307
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Dunkel Schetter, C., & Dolbier, C. (2011). Resilience in the context of chronic stress and health in adults. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 634–652.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00379.x
Giangrasso, B., & Casale, S. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey with a general population sample of undergraduate students. Social Indicator Research, 116, 185–197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0277-z
Gignac, G. (2008). Higher-order models versus direct hierarchical models: G as superordinate or breadth factor? Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 21–43.
Gjesfjeld, C. D., Greeno, C. G., & Kim, K. H. (2008). A confirmatory factor analysis of an abbreviated social support instrument: The MOS-SSS. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 231–237.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049731507309830
Gottlieb, B. H., & Bergen, A. E. (2010). Social support concepts and measures. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69, 511–520.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.10.001
Gottlieb, B. H. (2000). Selecting and planning support interventions. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), (2000). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 195–220). New York: Oxford University Press.
Grav, S., Hellzèn, O., Romild, U., & Stordal, E. (2012). Association between social support and depression in the general population: The HUNT study, a crosssectional survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 111–120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03868.x
Griep, R. H., Chor, D., Faerstein, E., Werneck, G. L., & Lopes, C. S. (2005). Construct validity of the Medical Outcomes Study's social support scale adapted to Portuguese in the Pro-Saude Study. Cadernos de Saúde Publica, 21, 703–714.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2005000300004
Holmstrom, A. J., & Burleson, B. R. (2011). An initial test of cognitive-emotional theory of esteem support messages. Communication Research, 38, 326–355.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650210376191
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hupcey, J. E. (1998). Clarifying the social support theory-research linkage. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27, 1231–1241.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.01231.x
Jovanović, V. (2015). Structural validity of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: The bifactor model of emotional, social and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 154–159.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.026
Karademas, E. C. (2006). Self-efficacy, social support and well-being: The mediating role of optimism. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1281–1290.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.019
Keyes, C. L. M., Wissing, M., Potgieter, J., Temane, M., Kruger, A., & van Rooy, S. (2008). Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 15, 181–192.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.572
Kim, S., & Mazza, J. (2014). Reliability, validity, and item response of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support score among incarcerated women. Women and Criminal Justice, 24, 1–21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2012.733327
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Lopez, M., & Cooper, L. (2011). Social support measure review. Los Angeles, CA: First 5 LA.
Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2 nd ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation.
Martire, L. M., & Franks, M. M. (2014). The role of social networks in adult health: Introduction to the Special Issue. Health Psychology, 33, 501–504.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000103
Masi, C. M., Chen, H. Y., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 219–266.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868310377394
Moser, A., Stuck, A. E., Silliman, R. A., Ganz, P. A., & Clough-Gorr, K. M. (2012). The eight-item modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey: Psychometric evaluation showed excellent performance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65, 1107–1116.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.007
Ng, W., & Diener, E. (2014). What matters to the rich and the poor? Subjective wellbeing, financial satisfaction, and post-materialistic needs across the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 326–338.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036856
Nurullah, A. S. (2012). Received and provided social support: A review of current evidence and future directions. American Journal of Health Studies, 27, 173–188.
Reevy, G. M., & Maslach, C. (2001). Use of social support: Gender and personality differences. Sex Roles, 44, 437–459.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011930128829
Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667–696.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
Reise, S. P., Moore, T., & Haviland, M. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.496477
Reise, S. P., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. D. (2007). The role of bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 16, 19–31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7
Robitaille, A., Orpana, H., & McIntosh, C. N. (2011). Psychometric properties, factorial structure, and measurement invariance of the English and French versions of the Medical Outcomes Study social support scale. Health Reports, 22(2), 33–40.
Rodriguez, M., & Cohen, S. (1998). Social support. In H. Friedman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health (pp. 535–544). New York: Academic Press.
Schaefer, C., Coyne, J. C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). The health related functions of social support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 381–405.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00846149
Schulz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2003). Soziale Unterstützung bei der Krankheitsbewältigung. Die Berliner Social Support Skalen (BSSS) [Social support in coping with illness: The Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS)]. Diagnostica, 49, 73–82.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.49.2.73
Schwarzer, R., Knoll, N., & Rieckmann, N. (2004). Social support. In A. Kaptein & J. Weinman (Eds.), Introduction to health psychology (pp. 158–182). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-657410-3/00414-1
Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science and Medicine, 32(6), 705–714.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B
Shrout, P. E., & Lane, S. P. (2012). Reliability. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics (Vol. 1, pp. 643–660). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13619-034
Shyu, Y. I., Tang, W. R., Liang, J., & Weng, L. J. (2006). Psychometric testing of the social support survey on a Taiwanese sample. Nursing Research, 55(6), 411–417.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200611000-00005
Siedlecki, K. L., Salthouse, T. A., Oishi, S., & Jeswani, S. (2014). The relationship between social support and subjective wellbeing across age. Social Indicators Research, 117, 561–576.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0361-4
Soares, A., Biasoli, I., Scheliga, A., Baptista, R. L., Brabo, E. P., Morais, J. C., ... Spector, N. (2012). Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(8), 1895–1900.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1292-8
Tarlov, A., Ware, J., Greenfield, S., Nelson, E., Perrin, E., & Zubkoff, M. (1989). The Medical Outcomes Study: An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA, 262, 925–930.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1989.03430070073033
Walen, H. E., & Lachman, M. E. (2000). Social support and strain from partner, family, and friends: Costs and benefits for men and women in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(1), 5–30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407500171001
Wang, W., Zheng, X., He, H. G., & Thompson, D. R. (2013). Psychometric testing of the Chinese Mandarin version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey in patients with coronary heart disease in mainland China. Quality of Life Research, 22(8), 1965–1971.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0345-x
Yu, D. S., Lee, D. T., & Woo, J. (2004). Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the medical outcomes study social support survey (MOS-SSS-C). Research in Nursing & Health, 27(2), 135–143.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20008
Zimet, G., Dahlem, N., Zimet, S., & Farley, G. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach's α, Revelle's β, and McDonald's ωH: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7
