Should I be bothered or not? Development of the Environmental Attitudes Scale (EAS)
Keywords:environmental attitudes, environmental behaviour, psychometric properties
The aim of this paper was to develop a reliable scale evaluating values, beliefs, and attitudes towards the environment, and to test its basic psychometric properties relative to its employment in Serbia. The final sample included 1020 participants (46.9% male and 53.1% female), aged from 18 to 86 (M = 39.29, SD = 15.77). All the participants completed the demographic questionnaire (age, sex, region, education, work, and economic status), and the EAS scale. This final scale included 34 items grouped into seven dimensions explaining 51.84% of the common variance: Love of nature 18.72%, Population growth policies 10.24%, Pro-environmental behaviours 8.94%, Preservation measures 4.28%, Environmental concern 3.87%, Instrumentalism 3.12%, and Environmental activism with 2.27% of the variance explained. EAS showed internal consistency ranging from .74 to .82 for the factor scales, and test-retest rtt = .80. Results confirmed three second-order factors (84.17% of variance explained): Pro-environmental factor (explaining 46.11% of the variance), contained the Love of nature, Environment concern, Pro-environmental behaviour, Environmental activism, and Preservation measures factors, the second contained only Population growth policies factor, explaining 25.19% of the variance, while the third contained the Instrumentalism factor, explaining 12.87% of the variance.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Domingues, R. B. & Gonçalves, G. (2020). Assessing environmental attitudes in Portugal using a new short version of the Environmental Attitudes Inventory. Current Psychology, 39, 629–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9786-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9786-x
Dunlap, R. E., Liere, K., Mertig, A. & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
Dunlap, R. E. & Jones, R.E. (2003). Environmental attitudes and values. In R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment, Vol. 1 (pp. 364–369). London, UK: Sage.
Franzen, A. & Vogl, D. (2013). Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1001-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009
García-Mira, R., Real, J. E. & Romay, J. (2005). Temporal and spatial dimensions in the perception of environmental problems: An investigation of the concept of environmental hyperopia. International Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000078
Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology (5th ed.). Coville: Optimal Books.
Gifford, R. & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
Gkargkavouzi, A., Paraskevopoulos, S. & Matsiori, S. (2021). Assessing the structure and correlations of connectedness to nature, environmental concerns and environmental behavior in a Greek context. Current Psychology, 40, 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9912-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9912-9
Hedlund-de Witt, А., de Boer, Ј. & Boersema, Ј. Ј. (2014). Exploring inner and outer worlds: A quantitative study of worldviews, environmental attitudes, and sustainable lifestyles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.005
Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kaiser, F., Merten, M. & Wetzel, E. (2018). How do we know we are measuring environmental attitude? Specific objectivity as the formal validation criterion for measures of latent attributes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.01.003
Kals, E., Schumacher, D. & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972056
Kennedy, E. H., Beckley, T. M., McFarlane, B. L. & Nadeau, S. (2009). Why we don’t “Walk the talk”: Understanding the Environmental values/ Behaviour gap in Canada. Research in Human Ecology, 16(2), 151-160.
Lindenberg, S. & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal-frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x
Marković, Z. (2005). Social ecology. Belgrade: Zavod za udžbenike.
Milfont, T. L. & Duckitt, J. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001
Rhead, R., Elliot, M. & Upham, P. J. (2015). Assessing the structure of UK environmental concern and its association with pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.002
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2): 23-74.
Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2013). Census of population, households and dwellings in the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade: Statistical office of the Republic of Serbia.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x
Uzzell, D. L. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(4), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0175
Wallace, D. S., Paulson, R. M., Lord, C. G., & Bond, C. F. (2005). Which behaviors do attitudes predict? Meta-analyzing the effects of social pressure and perceived difficulty. Review of General Psychology, 9, 214-227. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-26184.108.40.206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-26220.127.116.11
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Darko Hinić
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.