VALIDITY OF SERBIAN ADAPTATION OF THE REACTIONS TO TESTS SCALE

Authors

  • Miša Avramović Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Niš

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2019.1.5-21

Keywords:

confirmatory factor analysis, Reactions to Tests Scale, validity

Abstract

Aims of this research were to evaluate construct validity of the Serbian adaptation of Reaction to Tests scale and to assess some psychometric properties of this scale. In addition, a short version of the scale was created, with the idea to ​​correct the bad fit of the original version of the instrument, as well as making the scale more economical for the use. The research sample consisted of 300 conveniently selected students (average age 22.73). The confirmatory factor analysis tested the fit of the two models. The first one had correlated first-order factors, while the second model introduced a second-order factor. The full version of the scale had a bad fit. However, the short version of the scale (with 5 items in each subscale) had an excellent fit for the first model (CFI = .96; RMSEA = .048) and slightly weaker fit of the second model (CFI = .95; RMSEA = .055). The short version of the scale retained satisfactory coefficients of internal consistency (.78 to .91 for subscales and .92 for the full scale). Both the full and short version of the scale showed high convergent validity, through high correlations with the Test Anxiety Inventory. As such, short version of the scale has its use value, both in the research and in the clinical context.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Benson, J., & Bandalos, D. L. (1992). Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reactions to Tests Scale with Cross-Validation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27(3), 459–487. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_8
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 205–229. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002004
Byrne, M. B. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270–295. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1094
Deffenbacher, J. L. (1980). Worry and emotionality in test anxiety. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.), Test anxiety (111-128). Hillsdale, N.J.: LEA.
Depreeuw, E., & De Neve, H. (1992). Test anxiety can harm your health: Some conclusions based on a student typology. In D. G. Forgays, T. Sosnowski, & K. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Series in health psychology and behavioral medicine. Anxiety: Recent developments in cognitive, psychophysiological, and health research (pp. 211–228). Washington, DC: Hemisphere. doi:10.1002/per.400
Fan, X., Wang, L., & Thompson, B. (1999). Effects of Sample Size, Estimation Methods, and Model Specification on Structural Equation Modeling Fit Indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 56–83. doi:10.1080/10705519909540119
Hodapp, V., & Benson, J. (1997). The multidimensionality of test anxiety: A test of different models. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping: An International Journal, 10(3), 219–244. doi:10.1080/10615809708249302
Hodapp, V., Glanzmann, P. G., & Laux, L. (1995). Theory and measurement of test anxiety as a situation specific trait. In C. D. Spielberger & P. R. Vagg (Eds.), Test Anxiety. Theory, Assessment, and Treatment (pp. 47–58). London: Taylor & Francis.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
Jelić, D., Popov, B. i Sretković, T. (2014). Psihometrijske karakteristike PHCC upitnika ispitne ankioznosti. Primenjena psihologija, 7(1), 23–44. doi:10.19090/pp.2014.1.23-44
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörborn, D. (1984). LISREL VI users guide (3rd ed.). Moorsvilfe, IN: Scientific Software.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lazarus, R. S. (1999). A new synthesis: Stress and emotion. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Liebert, R. M., & Morris, L. W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety: A distinction and some initial data. Psychological Reports, 20, 975–978. doi:10.2466/pr0.1967.20.3.975
Mandler, G., & Sarason, S. B. (1952). A study of anxiety and learning. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 47(2), 166–173. doi:10.1037/h0062855
Morris, L. W., Davis, M. A., & Hutchings, C. H. (1981). Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: literature review and a revised worry-emotionality scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 541–555. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.73.4.541
Nasser, F., & Takahashi, T. (2003). The Effect of Using Item Parcels on Ad Hoc Goodness-of-Fit Indexes in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Example Using Sarason's Reactions to Tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(1), 75–97. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1601_4
Nist, P., & Diehl, M. (1990). Test Anxiety Questionnaire. Retrieved from: http://web.ccsu.edu/fye/teachingresources/pdfs/test%20anxiety%20questionnaire.pdf
Pekrun, B., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., & Molfenter, S. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 17, 287–316. doi:10.1080/10615800412331303847
Powers, D. E. (2001). Test anxiety and test performance: Comparing paper-based and computer-adaptive versions of the graduate record examination (GRE) general test. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 249–273. doi:10.2190/680w-66cr-qrp7-cl1f
Ringeisen, T. (2008). Emotions and coping during exams: A dissection of cultural variability by means of the tripartite self-construal model. Münster: Waxmann.
Ringeisten, T, & Buchwald, P. (2010). Test Anxiety and Positive and Negative Emotional States during an Examination. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 431–447.
Sarason, I. G. (1978). The Test Anxiety Scale: Concept and research. In C. D. Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and anxiety, Vol. 5 (pp. 193–216). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 929–938. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.46.4.929
Sarason, I. G. (1988). Anxiety, self-preoccupation and attention. Anxiety Research, 1, 3–7. doi:10.1080/10615808808248215
Sarason, S. B., & Mandler, G. (1952). Some correlates of test anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 47(4), 810–817. doi:10.1037/h0060009
Schwarzer, R. (1984). Worry and Emotionality as Separate Components in Test Anxiety. Applied Psychology, 33(2), 205–220. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1984.tb01429.x
Shevlin, M., & Miles, J. N. V. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences 25, 85–90. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00055-5
Sieber, J. E., O’Neil Jr., H. F., & Tobias, S (1977). Anxiety, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spielberger, C. D., Gonzalez, H. P., Taylor, C. J., Anton, E. D., Algaze, B., Ross, G. R., & Westberry, L. G. (1980). Manual for the Test Anxiety Inventory (“Test Attitude Inventory”). Redwood City, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Suinn, R. M. (1969). The STABS, a measure of test anxiety for behavior therapy: Normative data. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 7(3), 335–339. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(69)90018-7
Wine, J. (1982). Evaluation anxiety: A cognitive-attentional construct. In H. W. Krohne & L. Laux (Eds.), Achievement, stress, and anxiety (pp. 207–209). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum Press.
Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2011). Anxiety 101. New York: Springer Publishing.

Downloads

Published

26.03.2019

How to Cite

Avramović, M. (2019). VALIDITY OF SERBIAN ADAPTATION OF THE REACTIONS TO TESTS SCALE. Primenjena Psihologija, 12(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2019.1.5-21

Issue

Section

Regular issues