PUBLIC OPINION IN SERBIA ON ICTY: A CHICKEN OR AN EGG?

Authors

  • Mikloš Biro Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Serbia (retired)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2017.4.463-475

Keywords:

ICTY, public opinion in Serbia

Abstract

The paper presents seven consecutive public opinion polls in Serbia (in the period 2000–2011) on the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and its “partiality“ towards Serbs. The author connected changes in attitudes of citizens during the observed years with the public statements of the “national leaders“ about the Tribunal, as well as with the presentation of the facts of Serbian war crimes in Serbian media. Even though the observed correlation could not be interpreted in the terms of causal relation, the author pointed out to the importance of creators of the public opinion, and offered a possibility that the leading politicians and media in Serbia were not reactive to the attitudes of citizens (as they claimed) but vice versa – they created the public opinion of citizens by their statements or by presentation of the facts about Serbian war crimes.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Belgrade Centre for Human Rights & SMMRI (2003). Public opinion in Serbia: Attitudes toward the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Belgrade: Belgrade Centre for Human Rights.
Biro, M., Ajduković, D., Čorkalo, D., Djipa, D., Milin, P., & Weinstein, H. M. (2004). Attitudes towards justice and social reconstruction in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. In E. Stover & H. M. Weinstein (Eds.), My neighbor, my enemy: Justice and community after mass atrocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biro, M., Logar-Đurić, S., & Bogosavljević, S. (2000). Politički uticaj državnih i nezavisnih televizija u Srbiji. Nova srpska politička misao, 6, 227−242.
Biro, M., Mihić, V., Milin, P., & Logar, S. (2002). Did socio-political changes in Serbia changed the level of authoritarianism and ethnocentrism of citizens? Psihologija, 35, 37−47.
Čavoški, K. (1998). Hag protiv pravde [The Hague against justice]. Beograd: IKP „Nikola Pašić”.
Demostat (2017). Obaveštenost građana Srbije o ratovima '90-ih godina, ratnim zločinima i suđenjima optuženima za ratne zločine. Retrieved from http://www.hlc-rdc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Istrazivanje_javnog_mnjenja_Sudjenja_za_ratne_zlocine_Demostat.pdf
Hayden, R. M. (1999). Biased justice: Humanrightsism and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Cleveland State Law Review, 47, 1−549.
Kelman, H. C., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience. New Haven: Yale University Press.
OSCE, Belgrade Center for Human Rights, & IPSOS (2011). Attitudes towards war crimes issues, ICTY and the national judiciary. Retrieved from http://www.osce.org/serbia/90422?download=true.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461−476.
Tajfel, H., & Forgas, J. P. (2000). Social categorization: Cognitions, values and groups. In C. Stangor (Ed.), Stereotypes and prejudice (pp. 43−63). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Rds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33−48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

11.01.2018

How to Cite

Biro, M. (2018). PUBLIC OPINION IN SERBIA ON ICTY: A CHICKEN OR AN EGG?. Primenjena Psihologija, 10(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2017.4.463-475